Sunday, June 29, 2008

2009 Pontiac Vibe GT Review

The 2009 Pontiac Vibe GT doesn't win the statuette for enthusiasts' favorite in its category. That honor still belongs to the Mazda Mazda3, which has long delivered world-class driving dynamics that are unmatched in this price segment. Still, the Vibe GT's performance is incredibly engaging relative to most others in its class, and it trumps the 3 when it comes to cargo room and passenger space. The hardworking Pontiac Vibe GT deserves a starring role, but whether it's an ideal pick for you will depend on which attributes you value most in a wagon.

2009 Pontiac Vibe GT -12009 Pontiac Vibe GT -2Paired with the optional five-speed automatic transmission, our Vibe GT test car's 2.4-liter engine powers the wagon from zero to 60 mph in an invigorating 8.9 seconds ? a fairly impressive showing for its class. Around town, this willing engine makes the GT zippy and acquiescent, allowing it to easily finesse city and freeway traffic like a surfer on the crest of a righteous wave. The Vibe's transmission proves a capable match for this torquey inline-4.

At a combined 19.3 mpg, reported fuel economy is unimpressive, and dips below EPA estimates. Those estimates peg the 2009 Pontiac Vibe GT at 21 mpg in the city and 29 mpg on the highway. These numbers trail those achieved by competitors like the Mazda3 and Honda Fit, and mark the GT as somewhat of a laggard in this category.

The artificially low limits of its non-defeat stability control system serve to hamper the Vibe GT's performance in skid pad and slalom testing. On the skid pad, the wagon managed an unspectacular 0.75 g, with abundant body roll. On the slalom, its average speed was a lackluster 59.1 mph. However, our test-driver did note that while the Vibe feels tall through transitions, it never feels dangerous, as its limits are kept in check. When driven less aggressively around town, the GT's steering is reasonably responsive, and the wagon tackles corners with poise.

Pontiac's wagon offers ride quality that manages to be most things for most people. It's taut enough to satisfy those seeking some connection with the tarmac, but not so stiff as to put off those whose mandate is comfort.

� Source: edmunds
We need your comments below >>


autopark.blogspot.com

Saturday, June 28, 2008

HTC Touch Pro (Raphael) keyboard reviewed

HTC Touch Pro keyboard review


The hype building around the QWERTY keyboard-toting Windows Mobile 6.1 superphones from HTC and Sony Ericsson has finally come to this - a keyboard review. Sure, it might seem that a review of just the keyboard falls seriously short of giving potential customers an idea for just how great the HTC Touch Pro (codename: Raphael) really is, but when push comes to shove, the HTC Touch Pro and Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1 are touting their keyboard as a major feature.


HTC Touch Pro keyboard reviewMobileBurn has been lucky enough to get their hands on an early version of the HTC Touch Pro and they've proclaimed the keyboard on the HTC Touch Pro as superior to the Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1's QWERTY bits. With smaller buttons than HTC's previous keyboard keys, the HTC Touch Pro's keyboard is at once extremely usable and quite innocuous. With the keyboard tucked away under the full-body touchscreen, MobileBurn says that it's virtually impossible (aside from the added heft) to tell that the handset sports a full QWERTY keyboard.


Unfortunately, HTC didn't want their TouchFLO 3D interface getting toyed with just yet. Apparently, there are some new features that HTC wants to keep under wraps for now. That means MobileBurn's review is limited to just keyboard and design analysis. But, for anyone looking to plunk down some serious coin for either the HTC Touch Pro or the Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1, any sort of review is gold.


[Via: MobileBurn]


---
Related Articles at IntoMobile:









feeds.feedburner.com

Friday, June 27, 2008

Nokia 3120 classic review: Mid-range fighter



Gsmarena have posted their review of the Nokia 3120 Classic. Here are the key features, main disadvantages and conclusion.



Key features:

2" 16M-color QVGA display

2 megapixel camera with LED flash

S40 user interface

Compact and lightweight

Quad-band GSM support

3G network support, video-call

Bluetooth and USB connectivity

Stereo FM radio

microSD card slot, microSDHC support

Very good battery

2.5mm standard audio jack

Rich preinstalled content



Main disadvantages:

Slow camera and unimpressive image quality

Uncomfortable battery cover latch

Weak backlighting

Memory card slot under the battery cover



The first thing to note at wrap-up is the really nice performance and handling of Nokia 3120 classic. Yeah, we know it's not much of a specs sheet but what's there gets delivered right. Quad-band network support, excellent display and 3G do add value to the clean and simple 3120 classic.



In the beginning of this review we went to great lengths describing the serious pressure the 3120 classic will have to handle. That's good news for every user out there. All you need to do it is get your priorities right and indulge in the abundance of choice. This is a price range where value-for-money is imperative and it's up to you whether it's sleeker looks, better camera, 3G or simply the lower asking price.



All that said, it's unlikely for Nokia 3120 classic to let you down, especially if you get it on a deal or subsidized by a carrier.





feeds.feedburner.com

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Review of GSM/UMTS-handset Samsung F400


Mobile-review have posted their review of the Samsung F400 music phone. Here is their final impression.

The reception quality put up by the F400 is in line with other Samsung-branded devices. The ringtone volume is quite decent, as it can be heard in various environments. The silent alert is average strength-wise, no significant improvements have been made here.

Retailing for as much as 350 Euro, the F400 is not the device to look out for ? it?s pretty steep and doesn?t offer any substantial advantages compared to other Samsung-branded phones, plus there is not much to leverage as far as B&O?s branding is concerned. All in all, it?s a typical niche solution, to be really specific, the F400 is an ultra-niche phone that won?t be really popular. Samsung seem to struggle with every music phone they churn out, as they can?t find what unique traits and feats will make all the difference and set their phones apart from the competition.





feeds.feedburner.com

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Asus P750 review: Significant other


Gsmarena have posted their review of the ASUS P750 smartphone. Here are the key features, main disadvantages and final words.

Key features:
Windows Mobile 6.0 Pro
UMTS/HSDPA 3.6Mbps support with video calls
2.6" 65K-color TFT touchscreen display with QVGA resolution
520 MHz Marvel CPU
64MB of RAM, 256MB of ROM
3.15 megapixel auto focus camera and a secondary VGA video-call camera
Wi-Fi support
Built-in SiRF Star III GPS receiver (A-GPS support)
USB and stereo Bluetooth support
microSDHC memory card slot
High-quality materials and excellent construction
Hardware keypad
Rich retail package
Microsoft Office viewing/editing suite
Pre-installed business card scanning application
Pre-installed additional time management applications
Pre-installed calls filtering application
Pre-installed Remote Desktop and Remote Presenter applications

Main disadvantages:
Tri-band GSM only
Hefty size
Limited amount of RAM
2.6 inch relatively small (in PocketPC terms)
Camera is really poor (we guess it might be a faulty unit)
Video recording resolution is way too low
No multimedia software preinstalled (Samsung offer that)
No Task Manager application preinstalled (HTC offer that)
No alternative web browser pre-installed (both Samsung and HTC offer that)
Asus Launcher application not customizable

Asus P750 is an excellent handset and a fast performer in almost every aspect. There are downsides of course such as the relatively large body, relatively small display, the low amount of RAM and the hopeless camera (that still might be a unit-specific issue). On the other hand, the P750 offers commendable build quality, nice choice of materials and excellent ergonomics.

Asus have not taken care of the not-so-thumbable Windows Mobile interface, but it's a flexible platform and some third-party customizations will sure allow more touch-centric operation (as opposed to stylus based). Once that's been taken care of, you will enjoy the capable hardware, which simply blows competing HTC products such as Touch Cruise and TyTN II away.

Our final conclusion is that the Asus P750 is a must-consider when you're shopping for your next PocketPC. You can hardly go wrong choosing it as your next Windows Mobile handset.




feeds.feedburner.com

Recommended

Recent posts

Download DVD movies